Home > autocorrelation function > standard error of autocorrelation

Standard Error Of Autocorrelation

comparison of convolution, cross-correlation and autocorrelation. Autocorrelation, also known as serial correlation, is the correlation of a signal with itself at different points in time. Informally, it is the similarity between observations as autocorrelation function a function of the time lag between them. It is a mathematical tool

Autocorrelation Example

for finding repeating patterns, such as the presence of a periodic signal obscured by noise, or identifying the missing fundamental frequency autocorrelation matlab in a signal implied by its harmonic frequencies. It is often used in signal processing for analyzing functions or series of values, such as time domain signals. Unit root processes, trend stationary processes, autoregressive how to calculate autocorrelation processes, and moving average processes are specific forms of processes with autocorrelation. Contents 1 Definitions 1.1 Statistics 1.2 Signal processing 2 Properties 3 Efficient computation 4 Estimation 5 Regression analysis 6 Applications 7 Serial dependence 8 See also 9 References 10 Further reading 11 External links Definitions[edit] Different fields of study define autocorrelation differently, and not all of these definitions are equivalent. In some fields, the term is

Autocorrelation Statistics

used interchangeably with autocovariance. Statistics[edit] In statistics, the autocorrelation of a random process is the correlation between values of the process at different times, as a function of the two times or of the time lag. Let X be a stochastic process, and t be any point in time. (t may be an integer for a discrete-time process or a real number for a continuous-time process.) Then Xt is the value (or realization) produced by a given run of the process at time t. Suppose that the process has mean μt and variance σt2 at time t, for each t. Then the definition of the autocorrelation between times s and t is R ( s , t ) = E ⁡ [ ( X t − μ t ) ( X s − μ s ) ] σ t σ s , {\displaystyle R(s,t)={\frac {\operatorname {E} [(X_{t}-\mu _{t})(X_{s}-\mu _{s})]}{\sigma _{t}\sigma _{s}}}\,,} where "E" is the expected value operator. Note that this expression is not well-defined for all time series or processes, because the mean may not exist, or the variance may be zero (for a constant process) or infinite (for processes with distribution lacking well-behaved moments, such as certain types of power

Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about autocorrelation function example Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with autocorrelation econometrics us Cross Validated Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested

Autocorrelation Test

in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autocorrelation are voted up and rise to the top Why autocorrelation affects OLS coefficient standard errors? up vote 3 down vote favorite 1 It seems that OLS residuals autocorrelation is not always an issue, depending on the problem at hand. But why residuals autocorrelation would affect the coefficient standard errors? From the Wikipedia article on autocorrelation: While it does not bias the OLS coefficient estimates, the standard errors tend to be underestimated http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/114564/why-autocorrelation-affects-ols-coefficient-standard-errors (and the t-scores overestimated) when the autocorrelations of the errors at low lags are positive. regression standard-error autocorrelation share|improve this question edited Sep 6 '14 at 22:45 Glen_b♦ 151k20250519 asked Sep 6 '14 at 22:34 Robert Kubrick 1,27041937 Consider an extreme case of correlation. Suppose all the errors were perfectly positively correlated. In other words, somebody had generated a single random number and added it to all the response values. How certain would you be of (say) the intercept in the regression? Would you have any clues at all concerning the size of the random value that was added? –whuber♦ Sep 6 '14 at 22:55 Yes, but that is true of any missing predictor that could explain 99% of the variance and we just ignore. Why are making a specific case for $Y_{t-1}$? –Robert Kubrick Sep 6 '14 at 22:59 My example is not missing any predictors at all: it is only positing an extreme case of autocorrelation among the residuals. –whuber♦ Sep 7 '14 at 13:34 ok, but how is this different than the case where we don't have any residuals autocorrelation, but we're not including another critical predictor? We can draw the same confidence conclusions because of that other critical predictor. T

Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/68724/time-series-correcting-the-standard-errors-for-autocorrelation workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Cross Validated Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. Join autocorrelation function them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top Time series: correcting the standard errors for autocorrelation up vote 1 down vote favorite I have performed a number of tests to detect any presence of autocorrelation in my standard error of monthly return series. The test results confirm that the standard errors are not independent. A Durbin-Watson test result shows an upper bound violation with a d-statistics of 2.16, which implicates (first order) negative autocorrelation. A second, Breusch-Godfrey test, performed to examine higher order correlation points outs that for the first 12 lags the tests fails to reject the null of no serial correlation. Isn’t this strange since the test results are contradicting each other? To get a better understanding of the correlation within the (dependent) variable I also implemented a corrgram. The Q-statistic results in this case shows a significantly autocorrelated data after the first lag (see image). The additional independent variable Q-statistic results show no presence autocorrelation. What I came across so far while searching on the internet for solutions to solve the autocorrelation are a large number of solutions. In order to obtain meaningful results from my OLS-regression I thought it was best to include a lagged dependent variable in the regression and generate Newey-West standard errors. This is probably a relatively simple but access

Related content

spatial autocorrelation error terms
Spatial Autocorrelation Error Terms p p p p p p p p

standard error of autocorrelation function
Standard Error Of Autocorrelation Function p comparison of convolution cross-correlation and autocorrelation Autocorrelation also known as serial correlation is the correlation of a signal with itself at different points in time Informally it p Autocorrelation Function Matlab p is the similarity between observations as a function of the time lag autocorrelation formula between them It is a mathematical tool for finding repeating patterns such as the presence of a periodic signal autocorrelation function example obscured by noise or identifying the missing fundamental frequency in a signal implied by its harmonic frequencies It is often used in signal processing for analyzing

standard error of partial autocorrelation
Standard Error Of Partial Autocorrelation p Search All Support Resources Support Documentation MathWorks Search MathWorks com MathWorks Documentation Support Documentation Toggle navigation Trial Software Product Updates Documentation Home Econometrics Toolbox Examples Functions and Other Reference Release Notes PDF partial autocorrelation function Documentation Model Selection Specification Testing Autocorrelation and Partial Autocorrelation On this page What p Autocorrelation Function Matlab p Are Autocorrelation and Partial Autocorrelation Theoretical ACF and PACF Sample ACF and PACF References See Also Related Examples More About p Partial Autocorrelation Function Formula p This is machine translation Translated by Mouse over text to see original Click the button